Contact: 0330 043 9488 | | More Contact Details | Not for profits click here

Performance League tables - Top 10s

Total Savings by Member The total value (£) of procurement and waste avoidance. This measure illustrates how much each memebr in each organisation has saved while they have been using the Warp It system. The longer the organisation has been on the system the higher the savings, generally. Use this metric to better understand how the length of time a system has been operating, and the relative time to achieve behaviour change in the staff body affects savings.
Click on this icon to view in depth details of how the savings are worked out

PlaceOrganisationTotal Savings
1st Place Marius Mada University of Cambridge £1048603
2nd Place Jessica Ingram Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure £762857
3rd Place David Henderson University of Glasgow £485147
4 Mary Gill University of Tasmania £359787
5 Christine The University of Queensland £323399
6 Estates Facilities Team Nottingham Trent University £303597
7 Edgar University College London £240539
8 Andrew Mouat Glasgow City Council £240354
9 Alexander Ford The Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust £218627
10 Paul Britton University of Salford £183116

Total Savings The total value (£) of procurement and waste avoidance. This measure illustrates how much each organisation has saved while they have been using the Warp It system. The longer the organisation has been on the system the higher the savings, generally. Use this metric to better understand how the length of time a system has been operating, and the relative time to achieve behaviour change in the staff body affects savings.
Click on this icon to view in depth details of how the savings are worked out

PlaceOrganisationTotal Savings
1st Place University College London £2503954
2nd Place University of Cambridge £2237922
3rd Place University of Kent £1467554
4 University of Glasgow £1339979
5 University of Tasmania £1293848
6 Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure £997616
7 The University of Queensland £993322
8 Hywel Dda University Health Board £735233
9 Griffith University £731506
10 University of Nottingham £699291

Total Savings Per Month The total savings per month is total savings divided by the number of months the organisation has been using the system. This metric better reflects the actual relative performance of an organisation. Use this metric to estimate how much you might save per month in a highly functioning system.
Click on this icon to view in depth details of how the savings are worked out

PlaceOrganisationTotal Savings
1st Place Griffith University £52250
2nd Place Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure £41567
3rd Place University of Cambridge £16455
4 University College London £15748
5 Cardiff University £14389
6 University of Kent £12230
7 East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust £11280
8 University of Tasmania £11251
9 British Heart Foundation £10100
10 University of Glasgow £9436

Return On Investment This metric shows how many times an organisation has saved the amount invested in the system over the year/s. That is - how many times the system has paid for itself. Use this metric to get a insight into how likely it is that the system will be financially risk free for your organisation!
Click on this icon to view The price for a Warp It subscription

PlaceOrganisationROI
1st Place University College London 601.33 x
2nd Place University of Cambridge 537.45 x
3rd Place University of Kent 516.02 x
4 University of Tasmania 454.94 x
5 University of Glasgow 321.80 x
6 Griffith University 257.21 x
7 The University of Queensland 238.55 x
8 Queen's University Belfast 219.38 x
9 The Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust 212.14 x
10 University of Reading 185.38 x

Carbon Saved Click on this icon to view an explanation of this metric

PlaceOrganisationCO2 Savings KG
1st Place University of Cambridge 1288811
2nd Place University College London 1283042
3rd Place University of Kent 778234
4 Hywel Dda University Health Board 706558
5 University of Glasgow 652897
6 City of Edinburgh Council 574685
7 University of Tasmania 530526
8 The University of Queensland 502373
9 Griffith University 315347
10 University of Nottingham 308680

Waste Avoided Click on this icon to view an explanation of this metric

PlaceOrganisationWaste Avoided KG
1st Place University of Kent 282961
2nd Place University of Glasgow 245601
3rd Place Hywel Dda University Health Board 190758
4 City of Edinburgh Council 174571
5 University of Cambridge 164884
6 University of Tasmania 160715
7 University College London 156753
8 Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure 124991
9 Griffith University 114106
10 The University of Queensland 111071

Total Members This metric is the number of members each organisation has on their Warp It portal. As you can see the more members an organisation has the more likelihood that they will have an effective system.

PlaceOrganisationTotal Members
1st Place South Western Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust 5078
2nd Place University College London 4971
3rd Place University of Cambridge 3188
4 NHS Grampian 3103
5 University of Oxford 2454
6 Imperial College London 2288
7 University of Reading 2123
8 The University of Queensland 2024
9 The University of Leeds 1963
10 University of Glasgow 1949

Trades Per Month This metric is a reflection of the average number of trades a month. As you can see the higher number of trades generally means higher savings. However this is not always the case as many organisations use the system to trade low value but high volume items like stationery.

PlaceOrganisationTrades Per Month
1st Place Griffith University 102
2nd Place LEICESTERSHIRE PARTNERSHIP NHS TRUST 73
3rd Place Hywel Dda University Health Board 48
4 University of Kent 47
5 East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust 38
6 University of Glasgow 35
7 University of Tasmania 28
8 University College London 27
9 Cardiff University 25
10 The Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust 23

Savings Per Member This metric shows the value that each member can bring to your organisation. Use this figure to work out what your savings might be if you can get say, 500 staff onto your system. Or 1000! Or 10,000!

PlaceOrganisationTotal Savings
1st Place University of Strathclyde £7778
2nd Place West Midlands Police £5114
3rd Place British Heart Foundation £3788
4 Glasgow City Council £3375
5 Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure £2387
6 Stevenage Bioscience Catalyst £2169
7 University of Technology Sydney £2111
8 An Post £1448
9 Northern Ireland Schools £1178
10 Griffith University £1148

Donated To Charity This metric shows the top 10 donating organisation and the value of goods they have passed to charity.

PlaceOrganisationDonated To Charity
1st Place Hywel Dda University Health Board £571168
2nd Place City of Edinburgh Council £532993
3rd Place Derbyshire Community Health Services NHS Foundation Trust £256572
4 University College London £232419
5 University of Glasgow £194757
6 University of Kent £144164
7 Royal Devon University Healthcare £105724
8 Shropshire Council £105128
9 University of South Wales £72425
10 Swansea University £71818

Quickest Payback This metric shows the top 10 organisation who achieved payback quickest. That is the time it took from signing up to when the system paid the subscription cost. You can use this metric to get an idea on how quickly you might recover your organisation's investment.

PlaceOrganisationNo Of days until payback
1st Place NHS Tayside 9
2nd Place Royal Veterinary College 15
3rd Place The University of Queensland 18
4 LEICESTERSHIRE PARTNERSHIP NHS TRUST 30
5 University of Exeter 31
6 University of Technology Sydney 36
7 DORSET HEALTHCARE UNIVERSITY NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 39
8 City of Parramatta 40
9 Griffith University 40
10 Swansea University 41

Large Charity Donates The following top 10 have achieved the most value items from the system.

PlaceOrganisationAmount Given
1st Place The Edinburgh Remakery £1798053
2nd Place East Midlands Charities £651982
3rd Place Welsh Charities £633630
4 West Midlands Charities £578233
5 National Charities £571263
6 South East Charities £498181
7 Scottish Charities £309047
8 North East Charities £224547
9 Yorkshire Charities £212422
10 City of Edinburgh Council Reuse Partners £193150

Small Charity Donations The following top 10 have achieved the most value items from the system.

PlaceOrganisationAmount Given
1st Place Rom valley based charity £172730
2nd Place Kelso based charity £132766
3rd Place Whitby based charity £80453
4 MANCHESTER based charity £23342
5 Alva based charity £8612
6 Southampton based charity £6390
7 London based charity £6118
8 Lanark based charity £4468
9 Ingleby Barwick based charity £4320
10 Glasgow based charity £3942

What our customers are saying



Excellent service which saves so much money in the long run.

Anon, Hywel Dda University Health Board

Great!

Nancy Gilmour, Lancashire Teaching Hospital

I think reusing equipment is a brilliant idea and the site is really quick and easy to use Works very well!

Judith Hutchison, Southern Health and Social Care Trust